Challenges with fee disclosure have been highlighted by the Financial Advice Association of Australia (FAAA). Issues surrounding ongoing fee consents are central, with the initial intent of simplifying Fee Disclosure Statement (FDS) obligations facing substantial real-world hurdles instead. According to the FAAA, the objective of streamlining has backfired, resulting in duplicated forms and widespread confusion.
A notable legislative complexity includes the requirement for an account number on fee consent forms to authorise fee deductions from financial products, even for new accounts without available account numbers. The FAAA pointed out this flaw in the law imposes an extensive regulatory burden across the board.
Phil Anderson, FAAA General Manager of Policy & Advocacy, expressed that the problem stems from the convolutions of transitioning from prior arrangements and the ASIC rulings. Despite recognising these issues post-legislation, addressing them requires legislative amendments. The primary concern hinges on Section 962T of the Act, which mandates an account number's inclusion for Ongoing Fee Arrangements, though often unavailable during form completion.
The crux of the issue is whether the absence of an account number invalidates the consent form, a dilemma Anderson discussed extensively with Treasury and the ASIC. Treasury suggested in February 2025 that legislative changes were necessary for resolution, advising consultation with ASIC for regulatory clarification.
In subsequent discussions, ASIC maintained the necessity of the account number on consent forms, corroborating that alternative solutions were unviable under the existing legislation. The FAAA cautioned that such an approach could lead to automatic termination of affected fee arrangements, causing significant administrative strains.
This technical flaw in the DBFO legislation has triggered substantial administrative efforts from advisers to address the submission of incomplete consent forms, resulting in numerous breach reports with considerable associated costs. Despite early awareness of the issue, the current legal framework offers no immediate remedy by either the Minister or ASIC.
In summary, the regulatory landscape under DBFO, as it stands, has created considerable challenges and expenses for financial advisers, highlighting the need for legislative attention to rectify these unintended consequences.
Published:Wednesday, 13th Aug 2025
Source: Paige Estritori
![]() |
Self-Directed Investors Urged to Assume Greater Responsibility 14 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori The evolving landscape of private credit funds in Australia necessitates greater responsibility from self-directed investors, according to Darren Connolly, the Chief Executive of Investment Markets. As the landscape of fixed income investments becomes increasingly complex, investors are being urged to take ownership of their decision-making processes. - read more |
![]() |
Reserves Bank's Rate Cuts: Impact on Australian Housing Affordability 14 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) recently made a pivotal decision to cut the official cash rate (OCR) by 0.25%, bringing it down to 3.60%. This move marks a total reduction of 0.75% from its peak of 4.35%. Economists and financial markets anticipate further cuts, potentially two more by mid-2026, reflecting a cautious easing policy by the RBA. - read more |
![]() |
Costly Glitches Plague Fee Disclosure Under New DBFO Legislation 13 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori As financial planners await forthcoming updates to the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) legislation, many are grappling with significant challenges arising from the first tranche, specifically concerning fee consent requirements. These issues, unfortunately, seem to require legislative amendments as they fall outside the scope of regulatory fixes, amplifying the compliance burden on financial advisers, especially regarding breach reporting. - read more |
![]() |
RBA's Rate Cut Strategy Sparks Industry Debate on Future Moves 13 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has recently initiated a 0.25% cut to the official cash rate, stirring dialogue among industry leaders about the timing and necessity of potential future cuts. Despite the reduction aligning with broad expectations, there are diverging opinions about further reductions this year. - read more |
![]() |
Opportunities for Serving the Mass Affluent Market in Financial Advice 12 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori Charlie Viola, executive chairman of Viola Private Wealth, recently highlighted a promising opportunity for financial institutions to better serve the mass affluent market. Despite the recent trends stemming from the royal commission that have seen personnel changes across the financial advisory sector, Viola asserts that there remains a strong clientele base. The financial advisory business, he notes, benefits from a steady stream of increasingly wealthy individuals, but the challenge lies in effectively serving those with moderate wealth. - read more |